Dr. Jason Siko wrote: “We are currently in a transition between the
NCLB/standardized testing/high stakes/evaluation/fact-based content standards
phase and the Common Core Standards, which try to emphasize more
process-oriented skills. However, while this transition takes place, teachers
are stuck in the middle: they're being encouraged to promote these skills yet
schools (and teachers) are being evaluated on "the test." Further, as
we've seen in this week's readings, inquiry-based learning is not a panacea for
education, and some believe that good ol' fashioned direct instruction is
better."
- How
can a teacher find balance during this transition from more traditional
knowledge-based content standards and more process-oriented skills?
- What
are key factors that help improve the success of inquiry-based lessons?
- What
role can technology play in assisting those factors? Give specific
examples.
We read two very interesting articles this
week about inquiry-based learning. The
links to those articles are ...
The Case for Guided Methods of Instruction and Why Minimal
Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work.
I think these are “must reads” for educators. The second article in particular explains
some of the psychology supporting the claims of the authors.
1. I think that if we as teachers are mindful of
using process-oriented instruction in the traditional knowledge-based setting,
we will begin to develop lessons that promote higher-order thinking while still
catering to the rigorous standards of testing required by NCLB. It is interesting that some experts view
inquiry-based learning as a technique in which students are left to their own
devices to learn how/why things work. I
view this as an extremist view. I also
view traditional knowledge-based instruction as an extremist approach in the
other direction. There is definitely
room in the middle for a more balanced approach. First of all, teachers must be aware that
there is a difference between these two approaches and become educated about
the pros and cons of each. To begin the
process of attaining balance, we can do several things to move from the extreme
traditional methods of teaching to a more process-oriented classroom. First, providing sound reasoning early in a
lesson along with good examples for students to follow are both important. Then, during and after students have had the
chance to apply the lessons with hands-on applications, teacher guided
instruction to correct misconceptions is also essential. This can occur through group or class
discussions, or even one-on-one. I think making small changes like this will
place students on the path to reasoning the “how’s and the why’s” (application)
of each lesson, thereby allowing students to apply their new knowledge in
various ways…the type of higher-order thinking we want our students to develop.
2. Some key factors to help improve success of inquiry-based
lessons are instructional guidance and assistance /feedback throughout the
learning experience. If left alone while
learning, students can become overwhelmed with information and their
working-memory becomes overloaded. As Kirschner’s
article points out, it has been shown that pure process-based lessons do not
have high success rates due to the cognitive architecture of the human mind. It is important that we as teachers support
the learning process of our students by providing good examples and feedback
during a lesson, rather than just letting students explore on their own.
3.
Technology can help teachers by providing the means
for detailed examples and reasoning. For
instance, an interactive SMARTboard lesson about triangles could provide
students with a visual and auditory experience to see WHY the angles of a triangle
add up to 180 degrees. This, followed by
an individual interactive computer lesson which applies the new found knowledge,
would then help to solidify the lesson.
The computer model could also allow for development of problem solving
skills by giving students questions in which higher-order thinking must be
used. This should all happen while the
teacher circulates through the class or is available online to answer questions
and provide support. An assessment
generated from these individual lessons would provide immediate feedback to the
teacher allowing for follow-up as needed. Thus, the use of technology as we try to merge traditional instruction with process-based lessons provides "access to information...and structure for inquiry-based lessons," as Dr. Siko pointed out in a class document.